News of the harrowing explosion at the finish line of the
Boston Marathon struck a nervous chord in the hearts of us all last week. The first thought that comes to mind is a
hope that it was an accident, a ruptured gas line or the like. Shortly after the first blast comes the
report of a second. Not unlike the
second plane to hit the World Trade Center, the likelihood of malicious intent
begins to resonate. For most Americans,
any doubts soon give way to anxiety, manifested and swollen with fear, anger,
and suspicion. “Who could have committed
such an atrocity and why?” Unsubstantiated
news reports of two men of “dark complexion” go unchallenged[1]
seem to satiate the knee-jerk reaction to accuse the usual suspects. Meanwhile, for Muslim Americans, experiencing
the same feelings of violation as the rest of America, have a compounded sense
of apprehension as we worriedly await reports that we hope will alleviate the
thoughts racing through our minds and silent prayers of “God, please don’t let
it be a Muslim who has done this” made beneath our breath.
[3]
Although his aim was, by definition, an act of terrorism, he is most often
referred to simply as “a pilot.” Had his
name been Abdullah, the conventional designation of “terrorist” would
apply. Case-in-point, the following
article appearing in Wall Street Journal: Russell Gold, Bob Sechler, and Evan Perez,
“Tax Protester Crashes Plane Into IRS Office,” Wall Street Journal, 10
Febuary 2010. Available from: http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703315004575073401102945506.html
(Accessed April 26, 2013).
[4] The actual figure being roughly 13%.
[5] The definition of Terrorism as defined by Merriam Webster: “Systematic use of violence to create a general climate of fear in a population and thereby to bring about a particular political objective.”
[6] 3:151-154 can be rendered in English as follows and concerns the Battle of Uhud in which the Meccans sought revenge for earlier losses by Muslim forces: “We will strike panic into the disbelievers’ hearts because they attribute partners to God although He has sent no authority for this: their shelter will be the Fire– how miserable is the home of the evildoers! God fulfilled His promise to you: you were routing them, with His permission, but then you faltered, disputed the order, and disobeyed, once He had brought you within sight of your goal – some of you desire the gains of this world and others desire the world to come– and then He prevented you from [defeating] them as a punishment. He has now forgiven you: God is most gracious to the believers. You fled without looking back while the Messenger was calling out to you from behind, and God rewarded you with sorrow for sorrow. [He has now forgiven you] so that you may not grieve for what you missed or for what happened to you. God is well aware of everything you do.” Thus, in no way is this verse be justification for the September 11th attacks, as implied. Translation available from: M.A.S. Abdel Haleem, trans., The Qur’an: A new translation (New York: Oxford University Press, 2005), cited by verse.
[7] Ross Reynolds, “Boston Marathon Bombings: Social Media Manhunt,” The Conversation, interview transcript http://kuow.org/post/boston-marathon-bombings-social-media-manhunt (Accessed 22 April 2013).
[8] Of the high profile terrorism cases involving Muslims in recent years, all have invested their time in secular studies rather than studies of Islamic sciences: Faisal Shahzad, MBA from Southwestern University, Bridgeport; Umar Farouk Adbulmutalib, Engineering, Business Finance University College London; Nidal Hasan, Biochemistry, Virginia Tech, Psychiatry USUHS; Anwar al Awlaki (though never found to commit nor ever charged with committing any act of terror, was considered to have inspired all of the above persons―and was killed by a drone strike, despite being an American citizen), Civil Engineering, Colorado State; Educational Leadership, San Diego State; Human Resource Development, George Washington University.
[9] Tom Brokaw made a striking observation on Meet the Press, not normally made in popular media in which he states, “What prompts a young man to come to this country and still feel alienated from it, to go back to Russia and do whatever he did and I don’t think we’ve examined that enough? I mean, there was 24/7 coverage on television, a lot of newspaper print and so on, but we have got to look at the roots of all of this because it exist across the whole subcontinent, and the-- and the Islamic world around the world. And I think we also have to examine the use of drones that the United States is involved and-- and there are a lot of civilians who are innocently killed in a drone attack in Pakistan, in Afghanistan, and in Iraq. And I can tell you having spent a lot of time over there, young people will come up to me on the streets and say we love America. If you harm one hair on the-- on the head of my sister, I will fight you forever and there is this enormous rage against what they see in that part of the world as a presumptuousness of the United States.” Referenced: Meet the Press, “April 21: Deval Patrick, Mike Rogers, Dick Durbin, Pete Williams, Michael Chertoff, Tom Brokaw, Doris Kerns-Goodwin, Peggy Noonan, Jeffery Goldberg,” review of the events surrounding the Boston Marathon bombing, Meet the Press, PDF Transcript, p 10:
[12] Sahih Muslim, Book 019, Number 4320, Chapter 19: Prohibition of killing women and children in war.
[13] For a discussion on this issue, refer to: Imam Zaid Shakir, “Youth, Politics & Islam” (lecture, New York University, New York, NY, 10 December 2010). Viewable at: http://www.newislamicdirections.com/media/youth_islam_and_politics (Accessed 23 April 2013). Referenced comments begin at 17:30.
[14] To this day, in some Muslim majority countries, school children are required to learn about the religion of their family―be they Muslim or otherwise, not unlike the confirmation process required of Catholics.
The hours turn to days; claims of responsibility go
unspoken for. While there are always
quick accusations by the likes of Erik Rush and his tweets that Muslims are
“evil” and “Let’s kill them all” we maintain hope that the accused will turn
out to be another Adam Lanza, James Holmes, Wade Page, or Joe Stack[2]-
names which statistics far more associate with violent crime than the likes of
”Muhammad” or “Omar.”[3]
Video stills are released by the FBI and
reports emerge that the two suspects are “white males.” Tensions remain elevated but somewhat
decreased, for as Muslims, we know our faith to be represented by all
ethnicities and backgrounds―despite the misconceptions that Islam is a religion
of Arabs.[4] Upon seeing the stills we notice the suspects
also appear clean shaven, wearing baseball caps― another sign that perhaps this was again a massacre committed by an
anti-government, white male whose religion will largely go unmentioned and for
whom the terrorist label will be set aside, regardless of motive.[5] Yet, if we were to attach the same conditions
to white males that are attached to Muslims―or brown people with whom a certain
semblance is shared, civility in this country would suffer a complete
breakdown.
Confirmation of the suspects’ identity brings joy to the
likes of Erik Rush and Pamela Geller, who can now bask in the stench of their
bigotry―“we told you so! Muslims are
evil!” they can say with empty rhetoric and false confidence. More posters featuring images of the WTC
buildings ablaze followed with Qur’anic verses taken out-of-context[6]
can convince unstable individuals such as Erika Menendez that pushing a man off
a subway platform, ahead of an oncoming train is justified. The man in this case, Sunando Sen, a Hindu, was
mistaken for a Muslim. The
aforementioned posters adorned the subway walls, serving as a backdrop of hate
for all to aspire. Wade Page can now
rest peacefully that his savage assault on the Sikh temple he mistook for a
mosque, was “close enough.” In fact, few
were alarmed at these killings―as if the only crime was one of mistaken
identity. The latest victim, Sunil
Tripathi, found floating face down in the Providence River (as of now, the
cause of death is unknown), was falsely named as a suspect of the Boston
bombing by careless social media “journalists.”
His family received a surge of hateful threats that were simply glazed
over with an empty apology from the Redit social media outlet and the pushing
of a delete button by the wave of tweeters who felt it their place to reproduce
unsubstantiated reports. One journalist reports
the after she confronted one such twitterer about his “confirmation” of Mr.
Tripathi’s involvement, he essentially replied “well, there’s so many people
saying it, it must be true!”[7] These reckless reports may have resulted in a
young man’s death.
Conclusions made about the motivations of the suspects
fall in line with the bloodstained ads on the subway walls, that is, the
religion of Islam made them do it. “They
became more religious,” it’s reported, “praying five times a day; the senior
brother’s wife wore a hijab,” as if the mere practicing of Islam must be the
motivation behind committing atrocities.
Thus, women who wear hijab and men who have beards (or heaven forbid
turbans), are legitimate targets. Yet,
the images seen everywhere of the perpetrators demonstrates they were not
unlike their victims in appearance. When
I arrived up at my mother’s house the day the suspects’ identities were announced
wearing traditional Islamic attire, she said I should be careful to avoid being
shot. “For what”, I ask, “wearing a
turban?” Should I simply shave my beard
and hide who I am because of someone who looks nothing like me kills in the
name of my faith? Should a Catholic
leave their crucifix at home because yet another priest was caught molesting a
child? Should a Jew remove his yarmulke because
one of his own shot up a theater in Aurora?
Perhaps conservative Christians should stop proselytizing because of
Timothy McVeigh? Of course not, but this
is the common logic as applied to Muslims.
“It’s their religion” it’s said when a Muslim stands accused, but it’s
their “sanity” or “political ideology” when someone else commits a heinous
act. As to cancel the Boston Marathon
would give victory to the suspected terrorists, hiding my identity as a Muslim or
to be ashamed of my faith would be to do likewise.
Few persons charged with committing or attempting to
carry out terror attacks are outwardly Muslim and not a single one of them ever
received lessons in Islam by a qualified teacher or alim, yet the majority of
these people have spent years of their lives earning degrees in western secular
studies.[8] In
simple matters of etiquette, which if violated constitute a major sin, such as
interrupting the Friday sermon to voice a disagreement with the speaker, as was
mentioned about the deceased suspect, is indicative of a simpleton bereft of a
basic understanding of his faith. The
excuses of such persons are predictable and in line with those of federal
agencies, that is, violence against Muslims abroad, be it drone strikes[9]
that have taken the lives of nearly 200 children[10],
or a full scale war, resulting in the insurmountable civilian casualties,
heightens the risk of terrorism against the United States.[11] The common claim by those who attack this
country is that the military’s failure to distinguish between combatants
and non-combatants somehow justifies doing the same― a concept absolutely antithetical to the
teachings of Islam as agreed upon by our scholars. In reality, such persons exhibit profound
ignorance of Islam, compounded by cowardice, for how often have they made an
effort to share their religion with non-Muslims? One simply has to look at the life of the
Prophet, upon who is peace, to understand that were it not for his noble
character, Islam would have never won the hearts of his people. Rather, the character these persons resembles
that of Robert Bales, charged with leaving his base in Kandahar and gunning
down 16 Afghan men, women, and children. Neither religion nor state was a motivating
factor, yet surely he felt himself a patriot.
As sensible people try to understand how anyone could
walk into a crowd of innocent spectators and detonate a bomb, killing an eight
year old child, a young woman, and a student from China, not to mention those
wounded, must recognize that the acts of individuals cannot serve to represent
the adherents of an entire faith community, despite what Glenn Beck may
advocate. For no more than can the
crimes of Christians during the African Slave Trade or the subsequent crimes of
Jim Crow be attributed to Christianity (despite the justifications made at the
time), can terror committed by individual Muslims represent Islam. To paint Muslims with the broad brush of
terrorism adds insult to injury. The
blasts that went off in Boston were intended to kill Americans; we, too, are
Americans, Muslim Americans. Those who
sought to strike fear into the hearts of the American public did not set about
on an inquiry into the religion of those present ahead of time. Such persons consider all Americans, citizens
or not, as an equal opportunity to satisfy their aims. Yet, before the ashes land, Muslims on the
opposite side of the country become suspects.
We are then expected to apologize for something which we as individuals
had nothing to do with, and therefore to accept responsibility for the actions
of ignorant people whose actions do not represent our religion. For those who want to blame the religion of
Islam, know that Islam condemns the killing of innocent people, for the Prophet,
in no uncertain terms forbade such action and it is from his example that
Muslims are to conduct ourselves.[12]
[13]
Acknowledging that Muslims have carried out such acts should
cause us to reflect on our own priorities, however. What is the level of our practice? Are we proud of who we are and the Prophetic
tradition we have been gifted? Are we
embarrassed to pray in public or be identified as Muslims? If so, who are we benefitting? Where does our faith fit in on our priority
scale? Do we send our children to study Islam? Do we learn from those qualified to teach,
that is, those who have demonstrated a commitment to the formal study of
Islamic sciences―not simply from someone who picks up a book and thinks they
know all the answers? Have we learned
our creed (Aqeedah), as our faith requires?
For if we are doing nothing to better our understanding or improve our
practice, how can we understand, beyond the level of the mundane, that our
religion specifically condemns all attacks against innocent people? Our Prophet, upon him be peace, abhorred such
behavior and the attempt to excuse it by arguing reciprocity is to turn one’s
back on the teachings of Islam and embrace the teachings of rogue elements
within anarchist movement or worse still, the very people who justify “collateral
damage”―these become one’s teachers. None
can argue that Islam allows its adherents to kill innocent civilians because
“they do it to us.” They are not the example our religion sets forth, rather, it is we who
are tasked to rise above such savagery not adopt it.
For those who feel they cannot practice their Islam in
America, what does our religion command?
The answer lies in what was considered to be the greatest form of
worship during the time of the Prophet: Emigrate.
This is the prophetic example and the example by which Muslims are to
live. Never has living in non-Muslim
lands been an excuse to either leave aside our practice or force others to
comply with them.[14] For the vast majority of Muslim Americans,
however, we understand that we live in a country wherein a system exists that
affords us our religious liberties, where the letter of the law can be used to
stand against lawmakers who would prefer such rights be stripped from us, as in
states that have enacted anti-Shari’a laws.
How Muslims conduct ourselves through this process will have significant
ramifications for our future in the country. In times when our scholars are being replaced
with clowns who lack a basic understanding of this religion, offering two-day
degree programs, and believing they are qualified to guide others will only
denigrate a masterful tradition built upon 1,400 years of learning. Our seat at the American table awaits us. To fulfill that promise will require us to
live up to the prophetic example―nothing more, and nothing less. Only then will we pull ourselves up from the
caverns of ignorance and in so doing, the country as a whole. Choosing to ignore the involvement of Muslims
found guilty of egregious crimes will not enlighten our community. Our tradition abounds in teachings on how to
respond to difficulty in challenging times; any student of history can attest
to the success engendered by those who embodied these teachings. If, by the will of Allah ta’ala, we do so,
never again will “I hope it wasn’t a Muslim” enter our hearts, for we will have
taken our seat at the table of the American family.
Endnotes
[1]
Immediately following news reports of the 1995 Oklahoma City bombing, media
outlets released similar statements regarding two Arab men seen driving a
pick-up truck in the area at the time of the blast.
[2]
Profiles of the aforementioned persons: Lanza: white, male, Catholic; Holmes:
white, male, Jewish; Page: white, male, Christian; Stack: white, male, former
member of Universal Life Church.[4] The actual figure being roughly 13%.
[5] The definition of Terrorism as defined by Merriam Webster: “Systematic use of violence to create a general climate of fear in a population and thereby to bring about a particular political objective.”
[6] 3:151-154 can be rendered in English as follows and concerns the Battle of Uhud in which the Meccans sought revenge for earlier losses by Muslim forces: “We will strike panic into the disbelievers’ hearts because they attribute partners to God although He has sent no authority for this: their shelter will be the Fire– how miserable is the home of the evildoers! God fulfilled His promise to you: you were routing them, with His permission, but then you faltered, disputed the order, and disobeyed, once He had brought you within sight of your goal – some of you desire the gains of this world and others desire the world to come– and then He prevented you from [defeating] them as a punishment. He has now forgiven you: God is most gracious to the believers. You fled without looking back while the Messenger was calling out to you from behind, and God rewarded you with sorrow for sorrow. [He has now forgiven you] so that you may not grieve for what you missed or for what happened to you. God is well aware of everything you do.” Thus, in no way is this verse be justification for the September 11th attacks, as implied. Translation available from: M.A.S. Abdel Haleem, trans., The Qur’an: A new translation (New York: Oxford University Press, 2005), cited by verse.
[7] Ross Reynolds, “Boston Marathon Bombings: Social Media Manhunt,” The Conversation, interview transcript http://kuow.org/post/boston-marathon-bombings-social-media-manhunt (Accessed 22 April 2013).
[8] Of the high profile terrorism cases involving Muslims in recent years, all have invested their time in secular studies rather than studies of Islamic sciences: Faisal Shahzad, MBA from Southwestern University, Bridgeport; Umar Farouk Adbulmutalib, Engineering, Business Finance University College London; Nidal Hasan, Biochemistry, Virginia Tech, Psychiatry USUHS; Anwar al Awlaki (though never found to commit nor ever charged with committing any act of terror, was considered to have inspired all of the above persons―and was killed by a drone strike, despite being an American citizen), Civil Engineering, Colorado State; Educational Leadership, San Diego State; Human Resource Development, George Washington University.
[9] Tom Brokaw made a striking observation on Meet the Press, not normally made in popular media in which he states, “What prompts a young man to come to this country and still feel alienated from it, to go back to Russia and do whatever he did and I don’t think we’ve examined that enough? I mean, there was 24/7 coverage on television, a lot of newspaper print and so on, but we have got to look at the roots of all of this because it exist across the whole subcontinent, and the-- and the Islamic world around the world. And I think we also have to examine the use of drones that the United States is involved and-- and there are a lot of civilians who are innocently killed in a drone attack in Pakistan, in Afghanistan, and in Iraq. And I can tell you having spent a lot of time over there, young people will come up to me on the streets and say we love America. If you harm one hair on the-- on the head of my sister, I will fight you forever and there is this enormous rage against what they see in that part of the world as a presumptuousness of the United States.” Referenced: Meet the Press, “April 21: Deval Patrick, Mike Rogers, Dick Durbin, Pete Williams, Michael Chertoff, Tom Brokaw, Doris Kerns-Goodwin, Peggy Noonan, Jeffery Goldberg,” review of the events surrounding the Boston Marathon bombing, Meet the Press, PDF Transcript, p 10:
http://www.nbcnews.com/id/51611247/ns/meet_the_press-transcripts/t/april-deval-patrick-mike-rogers-dick-durbin-pete-williams-michael-leiter-michael-chertoff-tom-brokaw-doris-kearns-goodwin-peggy-noonan-jeffrey-goldberg/
(Accessed 23 April 2013).
[10] “178 Report.” War Costs. http://www.warcosts.com/178_report (Accessed 20 April 2013).
[11]
Although we reject all attacks on civilians, it must be recognized that the
Obama administration’s drone policies, like those of his predecessor, serve as
a major recruitment tool for those wishing to avenge the killing of civilians
in the Muslim world. For further reading
see the report (specifically chapter 5: “Strategic Considerations”) published
by the
Stanford
International Human Rights and Conflict Resolution Clinic and the Global
Justice Clinic at NYU School of Law: Living
Under Drones: Death, Injury and Trauma to Civilians from US Drone Practices in
Pakistan, September 2012, available from http://www.livingunderdrones.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/Stanford-NYU-LIVING-UNDER-DRONES.pdf
(Accessed 25 April 2013).[10] “178 Report.” War Costs. http://www.warcosts.com/178_report (Accessed 20 April 2013).
[12] Sahih Muslim, Book 019, Number 4320, Chapter 19: Prohibition of killing women and children in war.
[13] For a discussion on this issue, refer to: Imam Zaid Shakir, “Youth, Politics & Islam” (lecture, New York University, New York, NY, 10 December 2010). Viewable at: http://www.newislamicdirections.com/media/youth_islam_and_politics (Accessed 23 April 2013). Referenced comments begin at 17:30.
[14] To this day, in some Muslim majority countries, school children are required to learn about the religion of their family―be they Muslim or otherwise, not unlike the confirmation process required of Catholics.